the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff  used real human skeletons in its climactic scene where the Freeling family’s backyard is consumed by the earth and the remains of the original inhabitants of the land rise from the ground. The decision to use real skeletons was made by special effects artist Craig Reardon, who felt that they would look more realistic than prosthetic ones. The skeletons were obtained from a medical supply company, and the scene was shot over the course of several days.

The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist has been controversial, with some people finding it to be disrespectful to the deceased. However, others have defended the decision, arguing that it was necessary to create the desired effect. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide whether or not they find the use of real skeletons in Poltergeist to be acceptable.

It is important to note that the use of real human remains in film and television is a complex issue with a long history. There are no easy answers, and the ethical implications of using such materials must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

what is the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff

the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff did indeed use real skeletons in a scene. Special effects makeup artist Craig Reardon revealed this under oath, and actress JoBeth Williams also confirmed this in an interview. The use of real skeletons was not disclosed to the actors before filming, and it was only discovered later. This decision was made because it was cheaper and more practical to use real skeletons at the time. The use of these skeletons created unease on the set, and it was a controversial and unsettling aspect of the film’s production

The Controversy Surrounding Real Skeletons in the 1982 Movie Poltergeist

You’re right, the use of real skeletons in the 1982 movie Poltergeist is a significant point of controversy. Here’s a deeper dive into the issue: the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff

Facts:

• Scene:The skeletons appear in the film’s climax, where the Freeling family’s backyard becomes a graveyard, and the skeletons emerge from the disturbed earth.
• Reasoning:Special effects artist Craig Reardon chose them for their perceived authenticity over less convincing prosthetics at the time.
• Source:Obtained from a medical supply company, most likely intended for educational purposes.

Controversy:

• Ethical Concerns:Some find it disrespectful to the deceased to use their remains for entertainment purposes. Questions arise about consent and the treatment of human remains.
• Legal Concerns:While legal in the 1980s, some argue it should be illegal now due to ethical considerations.
• Actor Awareness:Lead actress JoBeth Williams was reportedly unaware she was interacting with real skeletons, adding another layer of ethical complexity.

Defense:

• Artistic Intent:Some argue the realism created a more impactful scene, serving the film’s message and horror genre expectations.
• Industry Practices:Using real skeletons for horror wasn’t uncommon in the past, though practices have evolved.

Modern Implications:

• Evolving Ethics:Today, the use of real human remains in films would likely face ethical and legal scrutiny, with alternatives readily available.
• Transparency and Consent:If such materials were ever considered, transparency and informed consent would be crucial.

Remember:

• This is a complex issue with no easy answers. Each individual weighs ethical considerations, artistic merit, and historical context differently.
• The Poltergeist case serves as a learning point for future filmmakers and raises important questions about respect for the deceased and responsible use of human remains.

I hope this expanded information helps you understand the controversy surrounding this aspect of Poltergeist.

Why Poltergeist’s Ending Used Real Human Skeletons

the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff The reasons behind using real skeletons in Poltergeist’s ending are multifaceted and raise important points about ethics, cost, and perceived authenticity in filmmaking. Here’s a breakdown:

Cost-Effectiveness:

• Creating highly detailed, realistic prop skeletons could be expensive in the early 1980s.
• Medical supply companies often sold real, prepared skeletons for educational purposes at a lower cost.
• While some argue authenticity wasn’t essential, cost was likely a factor for the production team.

Perceived Authenticity:

• Special effects artist Craig Reardon believed real skeletons would look more convincing than prosthetics of the time.
• The rawness and texture of actual bone might translate better on camera, especially with close-ups.
• This decision aimed to enhance the unsettling realism of the scene, a crucial element in horror.

Ethical Concerns:

• Using human remains for entertainment raises ethical questions about respect for the deceased and potential exploitation.
• The origin of the skeletons and whether proper consent was obtained remain murky, adding to the ethical ambiguity.
• This practice, while not uncommon in the past, is heavily scrutinized today and would likely be unacceptable.

Unintentional Impact:

• Lead actress JoBeth Williams reportedly wasn’t informed about the real skeletons, highlighting potential ethical lapses in communication.
• The knowledge of using real remains can heighten the disturbing nature of the scene for viewers, creating unintended emotional responses.

Modern Context:

• Today, readily available, high-quality prosthetic options and evolving ethical considerations make using real human remains highly unlikely in films.
• Transparency, informed consent, and respect for the deceased are paramount concerns for filmmakers using sensitive materials.

Conclusion:

the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff use of real skeletons in Poltergeist was a complex decision driven by cost, perceived authenticity, and filmmaking limitations of the era. However, it raises crucial ethical questions about the use of human remains in entertainment and serves as a historical example of practices that wouldn’t be acceptable today.

FAQ’s of the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff

1. Is it true the movie used real human skeletons?

Yes, in the iconic graveyard scene where the Freelings’ backyard becomes disturbed, the skeletons emerging from the earth were real human remains.

2. Why were real skeletons used?

Special effects artist Craig Reardon believed they would appear more realistic than prosthetics available at the time. Additionally, they were likely cheaper to acquire.

3. Where did the skeletons come from?

The exact source is unknown, but they were most likely purchased from a medical supply company that sold prepared skeletons for educational purposes.

4. Is using real skeletons in movies ethical?

This is a complex and debated issue. Many find it disrespectful to the deceased and raise concerns about consent and treatment of human remains. Today, this practice would be highly controversial and likely unacceptable.

5. Was anyone aware the skeletons were real?

Lead actress JoBeth Williams reportedly wasn’t informed, adding another layer of ethical complexity.

6. What are the ethical implications of this decision?

It raises important questions about respect for the deceased, informed consent, and the boundaries of artistic expression.

7. Are there any legal concerns?

While legal in the 1980s, the ethical considerations would likely lead to legal scrutiny today.

8. Would this happen today?

Highly unlikely. Modern technology allows for realistic prosthetics, and ethical sensitivities have evolved significantly. Transparency and informed consent would be crucial if such materials were ever considered.

9. Does knowing they were real skeletons change how you view the scene?

This is subjective. Some might find it more disturbing, while others might focus on the artistic intent.

10. What can we learn from this controversy?

The Poltergeist case highlights the complex ethical issues surrounding the use of human remains in film and serves as a reminder of evolving ethical standards and the importance of respect for the deceased.